THE INFLUENCE OF THE ARROW PUSHING STRUCTURE ON ITS PERFORMANCE

Authors

  • R.B. Gevko Ternopil National Technical University named after Ivan Pulyuy, Ukraine
  • A.V. Rud State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilya, Ukraine
  • Yu.F. Pavelchuk State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilya, Ukraine

Keywords:

soil, working body, triangular wedge, arrow paw, traction resistance, riser, working planes, loosening depth, speed of movement, grinding angle

Abstract

The article proposes a working body of seeders for subsoil-spreading sowing of cereals such as arrow paws with the parameters of the working bodies of the cultivator for pre-sowing cultivation of the soil, which is determined by the same working conditions. Similar studies to identify the optimal design parameters of arrow-shaped working bodies on soils with a moisture content of 29.9-31.0% (average soil hardness 1.41 мPa at a depth of 10-12 cm) were conducted by many scientists. They note the shortcomings of the small angle of elevation of the chest paws (grinding) on moist soils, as there is unsatisfactory pruning of the soil layer and breaking it with a rack, which does not provide quality grinding and promotes the formation of ridges. As a result, the traction resistance and the quality of processing, the optimal value of the grinding angle should be within 15 ... 18 °. The decrease in specific traction resistance in accordance with the increase in the width of the working body is explained by the significant share of resistance that falls on the riser of the working body - up to 45%.

Author Biographies

R.B. Gevko , Ternopil National Technical University named after Ivan Pulyuy

Dr.Techn. etc., Full Professor, Academician

A.V. Rud , State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilya

Ph.D., Professor
State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilya

Yu.F. Pavelchuk , State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilya

Ph.D., Associate Professor

References

Goryachkyn, V.P. (1968). Sobranye sochynenyi: V 3 t., t.1. Moskow : Kolos. [in Russian].

Klenyn, N.Y. & Sakun, V.A. (1994). Selskoxozyajstvennye i meliorativnye i mashyny, 3-d ed. Moskow: Kolos. [in Russian].

Vasylenko, P.M. (1961). Kultyvatory: Konstrukcy`ya, teory`ya y` raschet / Vasy`lenko P.M. & Babyi P.T. Kyiv: Ukr. akad. s.-x. nauk. [in Russian].

Novyczkyj, L.A. (1976). Voprosy teorii mashyn i mexanyzmov selskoxozyajstvennogo proyzvodstva: Mezhvuzov. sb. (Novyczkyi (Ed.) Petrozavodsk. [in Russian].

Vojtyuk, D.G. (Ed.) (2004). Silskogospodarski ta melioratyvni mashyny: Pidruchnyk/ D.G. Vojtyuk, V.O. Dubrovin & T.D. Ishhenko et al. Kyiv: Vyshha osvita. [in Ukrainian].

A. s. № 517282 (USSR) Soshny`k dlya razbrosnogo poseva / V.O. Belodyedov, A.V. Rud` & T.M. Byelodyedova; opubl. 1976, Byul. № 22. [in Russian].

Pat. na korysnu model № 103145 U. Ukrayina, MPK A01S 7/20(2006.01). Soshnyk / Gevko B. M., Pavelchuk Yu.F. & Zhaloba V. M. (Ukrayina). № u 2015 04036; Zayav. 27.04.2015. Opublikovano 10.12.2015. Byul. № 23. [in Ukrainian].

Published

2020-12-29

How to Cite

Gevko , R., Rud , A., & Pavelchuk , Y. (2020). THE INFLUENCE OF THE ARROW PUSHING STRUCTURE ON ITS PERFORMANCE. Podilian Bulletin: Agriculture, Engineering, Economics, 1(33), 62–68. Retrieved from http://pb.pdatu.edu.ua/article/view/239527

Issue

Section

Статті