THE INFLUENCE SEED TREAMENT OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS ON INDICATORS OF THE STRUCTURE HARVEST AND YIELD PEA VARIETIES
Keywords:
field-growth peas, variety, density of plants, biological products, productivity, yield structureAbstract
The aim of research was to study the characteristics of structure formation crop varieties mustache pea morphotypes by biological agents for seed treatment. Analyzing samples sheaves four varieties of peas, determine the total number of stems in bundles; the number of productive stems in bundles; the number of unproductive stems in bundles; the average number of pods per plant, analyzing 25 plants; the average number of grains, 1000 grain weight and the average weight of a grain of beans on the same 25 plants. It was found that in the southern part of the western forest-steppe on the productivity performance of individual grain varieties of field-growth peas had the greatest impact Rhizobofit seed treatment, Fosfoenteryn and Biopolitsyd. In our studies the use Rhizobofit seed treatment, Fosfoenteryn and Biopolitsyd was increased the germination of pea seeds. Integrated use of all three biologics increased the germination rate of 1-1.5%. Maximizes field germination of these drugs in grades Chekbek. Survival pea plants depended on the varieties and fertilizers characteristics. The greatest number of plants before the harvest was in grade Chekbek - 1142.3 thousand/ha, and the survival percentage - for seed treatment Rhizobofit, Fosfoenteryn and Biopolitsyd. The maximum height of the plants was in grade Ulus in processing Rhizobofit, Fosfoenteryn and Biopolitsyd. At the same use case produces a variety of biological products Otaman largest number of beans, seeds and seed weight per plant, and the maximum weight of 1000 seeds formed Chekbek grade. The highest yield in the experiment provide seed treatment Rhizobofit, Fosfoenteryn and Biopolitsyd. Thus, the yield was 3.91 Tsarevych varieties t/ha, or 0.28 t/ha more than in the control variant. Maximum productivity at the same seed treatment was pea varieties Chekbek and Otaman and amounted to 4.11 and 4.10 t/ha.References
Ghyrka, A.D., Sydorenko, Ju.Ja., Iljjenko, O.V., & Bochevar O.V. (2013) Sposoby pidvyshhennja zernovoji produktyvnosti ghorokhu v pivnichnomu Stepu Ukrajiny [Methods of increase of the grain-growing productivity of peas in north Steppe of Ukraine]. Bjuletenj Instytutu siljsjkogho ghospodarstva stepovoji zony NAAN Ukrajiny, 5, 58-63.
Ghrycajenko, Z.M., Ghrycajenko, A.O., & Karpenko, V.P. (2003) Metody biologhichnykh ta aghrokhimichnykh doslidzhenj roslyn i gruntiv [Methods of biological and agrochemical researches of plants and soils]. Kyjiv : ZAT «NIChLAVA».
Iljjenko, O.V. (2013). Formuvannja vrozhajnosti ghorokhu vusatogho morfologhichnogho typu pid vplyvom dobryv ta norm vysivu nasinnja v umovakh Pivnichnogho Stepu [Formation mustache pea yield under the influence of morphological type of fertilizer and seed standards in terms of the Northern Barrens]. Bjuletenj Instytutu siljsjkogho ghospodarstva stepovoji zony NAAN Ukrajiny, 4, 33-37.
Ishhenko, V.A. (2013). Elementy tekhnologhiji – rezervy pidvyshhennja urozhajnosti ghorokhu v Stepu [Forming of the productivity of peas of with a mustache morphological type is under act of fertilizers and norms of sowing of seed in the conditions of North Steppe]. Naukovo-tekhnichnyj bjuletenj Instytutu olijnykh kuljtur NAAN, 18, 85-92.
Klymenko, A.M. (2014). Vplyv riznykh frakcij Biopolicydu na skhozhistj nasinnja ta rozvytok siljsjkoghospodarsjkykh kuljtur [Effect of different factions Biopolitsydu on seed germination and development agricultural crops]. Aghroekologhichnyj zhurnal, 3, 105-108.
Jeshhenko, V.O., Kopytko, P.Gh., Opryshko, V.P., & Kostoghryz P.V. (2005) Osnovy naukovykh doslidzhenj v aghronomiji [Basic scientific research in agronomy]. Kyjiv : Dija.
Rjabokinj, T.M., Dvorecjka, S.P., & Jefimenko Gh.M. (2014) Produktyvnistj sortiv ghorokhu zalezhno vid rivnja intensyfikaciji tekhnologhiji vyroshhuvannja [Performance pea varieties depending on the intensification of cultivation technology]. Visnyk Centru naukovogho zabezpechennja aghropromyslovogho vyrobnyctva Kharkivsjkoji oblasti, 16, 212-217.
Taranukho, V.Gh., & Kamasyn S.S. (2009). Ghorokh: znachenye byologhyja, tekhnologhyja [Peas: the value of biology, technology]. Ghorky : Belorusskaja ghosudarstvennaja seljskokhozjajstvennaja akademyja, 56.
Kyrychenko, V.V., Oghurcov, Ju.Je., & Kostromitin, V.M. (2011) Tekhnologhija vyroshhuvannja ghorokhu [Technology of peas]. Kharkiv : Maghda LTD.
Chernjuk, O.P. (2013). Perspektyvy ta tekhnologhija vyroshhuvannja ghorokhu [Prospects and technology of cultivation of peas]. Naukovi praci Instytutu bioenerghetychnykh kuljtur i cukrovykh burjakiv, 18, 69-72.
Sagan, M., Ney, B., & Duc, G. (1993). Plant symbiotic mutants as a tool to analyses nitrogen nutrition and yield relationship in field-growth peas (Pisum sativum L.) Plant and Soil, 153, 1, 33-45.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Podilian Bulletin: Agriculture, Engineering, Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Public Policy and Administration agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this licence are made clear.
