THE EFFECT OF ENERGY SUPPLY AND WELFARE ON PRODUCTIVITY AND REPRODUCTIVITY HEIFERS MEAT POLL SYMNETALU NEW GENERATION

Authors

  • А. К. Калинка State Agricultural Experiment Station NAAS in Bukovina,
  • В. І. Гончар State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilya,
  • Т. М. Приліпко State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilya,

Keywords:

heifer, green feed, maintenance, energy growth, exchange energy. symental, beef, technology, zonal type

Abstract

The results of studies using the same type of feeding in summer with different technologies in maintenance productivity and reproductivity beef heifers poll symentalu new generation in the Carpathian region of Bukovyna. It was established that during the summer for 122 days’ average daily growing heifers 1st experimental group were - 864.7 g, 127 g (11.7%) (P> 0.005) than the peers’ control group. The costs of experimental animals feed mainly 8,6kh period amounted to. From., Which is 1.6 kg for. Units. (7.9%) less than the control. Within 29 days of the final period increments heifers experimental group (Loose maintenance), average amounted to -896.5 g, 190.0 g at (12.6%)% (P> 0.005) than the control group of peers’ attachable maintenance, which were adopted in the diet in the economy. The cost of feed experimental animals in the final period accounted for 8,9kh. Units. That 2,4kh to. Units. (7.9%) less than the control. During this period of research heifers live weight was on 28,5kh (11.0%) more than the control group. It was established that growing heifers on the same type of feed for different technologies keeping Bukovyna zonal type of meat in the Loose symentalu content on the stern platform in the summer, average daily gain increased by 12.6%, making this technology beef economical, profitable and perspective in modern conditions of doing beef cattle in the absence of appropriate animal feed premixes and foothill areas in terms of the Carpathian region of Ukraine. Consumption per 100 kg live weight of dry matter in heifers experimental group (Loose maintenance) basically run is 3.1 MJ, MJ which is 0.2 less than the control group peers.

Author Biographies

А. К. Калинка, State Agricultural Experiment Station NAAS in Bukovina

PhD (Agric.)

В. І. Гончар, State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilya

PhD (Agric.)

Т. М. Приліпко, State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilya

Dr. Sc. Agric Professor

References

Zubec' M. V., Sіrac'kij, J.Z., & Danilkіv, Ja. N. (1993). Viroshhuvannja remontnih telic' [Growing heifers]. Kiev : Urozhaj [in Ukr.].

Kalinka, A.K., & Shpak, L.V. (2008). Intensivnoe vyrashhivanie molodnjaka krupnogo rogatogo skota v uslovijah peredgor'ja Karpat [The intensive rearing of cattle in the conditions of the Carpathians]. Zootehnija [Animal husbandry], 2, 15-19 [in Rus.].

Kalinka A. K. (2002). Vplivracіonіv ta vіdgodіvel'nіjakostіm’jasnogo molodnjaku [Effect of diets and feeding qualities of young beef]. Tvarinnictvo Ukraїni [Ukraine Livestock], 8, 26-27 [in Ukr.].

Kozhushko, M. V. (1998). Vlijanie tipov kormlenija molodnjaka krupnogo rogatogo skota na prirosty zhivoj massy [Influence of type of feeding young cattle on live weight gains]. Problemi zooіnzhenarії ta veterinarnoї medicini [Problems of Zootechnics and Veterinary Medicine], 4 (1), 140– 143 [in Ukr.].

Bogdanov, G.O., Slavov, V.P., … Іbatulіn І.І. (2002). Metodichnі rekomendacії unіfіkacії doslіdzhen' po godіvlі m’jasnoї hudobi [Guidelines unification of research on feeding beef cattle]. Kiev [in Ukr.].

Kalinka L.Є., & Kalinka A.K. (2009). Metodichnі rekomendacії, shhodo shljahіv znizhennja sobіvartostі virobnictva jalovichini v peredgіr’ї Karpat [Methodical recommendations on ways to reduce the cost of production of beef in the foothills of the Carpathians] . Chernіvcі : BІAPV UAAN.

Kalashnikova, A.P., Klejmenova, N.I. (Eds.). (1986). Normy i raciony kormlenija sel'skohozjajstvennyh zhivotnyh [Standards and ration feeding farm animals]. Moskow : Agropromizdat [in Rus.].

Published

2016-04-19

How to Cite

Калинка, А. К., Гончар, В. І., & Приліпко, Т. М. (2016). THE EFFECT OF ENERGY SUPPLY AND WELFARE ON PRODUCTIVITY AND REPRODUCTIVITY HEIFERS MEAT POLL SYMNETALU NEW GENERATION. Podilian Bulletin: Agriculture, Engineering, Economics, 1(24), 109–114. Retrieved from http://pb.pdatu.edu.ua/article/view/135148