YIELD OF MILLET DEPENDING ON BIOLOGIZATION OF THE GROWING TECHNOLOGY
Keywords:
mille, , variety, seed inoculation, protection from weeds, feeding of plants by the liquid organic, yieldsAbstract
Due to the deepening worldwide ecological crisis, there is a steady increase in the need for food grown under conditions of organic farming. This trend will be deepen and supported by economic interest of manufacturers. That's why the high demand on today, is the introduction of organic farming, especially if cultivating the millet as the environmentally safe and diet raw materials for making the food products. The research program provided for the optimal way to protect against weeds in crops of millet in the conditions of organic production and study the effect of seed inoculation on growth, development, yield and quality of grain millet varieties studied. It was established that the highest yields of investigated millet varieties was obtained in the application of the chemical method of protection from weed, and seed inoculation by Hetomik. The study found that growing of investigated millet varieties in conditions of Right-Bank Forest- Steppe of Ukraine, without protection from weed and seed inoculation, ensure their productivity at 1,91−2,15 t/ha, while on variants with inoculation seed by Hetomik it was higher by 8,4−13,1 % (2,16−2,33 t/ha). The highest level of productivity was formed by Omriyane, in variants with inoculated seed by Hetomik preparation – 3,49 (chemical), 3,32 (mulch film), 2,96 (mechanical), 2,79 (sawdust mulch), 2,79 (mulching mature mycelium) and 2,45 t/ha (without protection from weeds). With seed inoculation by Humisol Plus preparation, yields on control variant (without dressing) were 2,86−2,99 t/ha, whereas the feeding crops by Humisol Plus (in II, III, VIII stages of organogenesis) increased them in 27,3−30,8 % and amounted to 3,64−3,91 t/ha. Prospects for further research on biologization millet cultivation technology should focus on identifying the most effective way to protect against weeds in agrocenoses, and on studing of the combined effect method of protection from weed, and seed inoculation with using of natural origin agents: Hetomik and Humisol Plus.References
Bielienikhina A. V. (2012). Vrozhainist suchasnykh sortiv prosa pry vzaiemodii adaptyvnykh faktoriv [The yield of modern varieties of millet in the interaction of adaptive factors]. Biuleten Instytutu silskoho hospodarstva stepovoi zony NAAN Ukrainy, 3, 27–32..
Volkodav V. V. (2000). Metodyka derzhavnoho sortovyprobuvannia silsko-hospodarskykh kultur [Methods of state sort testing crops]. Kiev : Derzhavna komisiia Ukrainy po vyprobuvanniu ta okhoroni sortiv roslyn.
Dospekhov B. A. (1985). Metodyka polevoho opita [Methods field experience]. Moskow : Kolos
Dudkyn V. M. & Lobkov V. T. (1990). Byolohyzatsyia zemledelyia, osnovnыe napravlenyia [Biologization agriculture, the main directions]. Moskow : Zemledelye.
Kasatkyn V. V. (1996). Proso. Tekhnolohyia proyzvodstva [Millet. Production technology]. Moskow : Zernovie kultury.
Kysil V. I. (2000). Biolohichne zemlerobstvo v Ukraini: problemy i perspekty [Biological agriculture in Ukraine: Problems and Prospects]. Kharkiv : Shtrykh.
Saiko V. F. & Dehodiuk E. H. (1994). Teoretychni osnovy i praktychni aspekty rozvytku «biolohichnoho zemlerobstva» v Ukraini [Biologization agriculture, the main directions]. Chabany : Zemlerobstvo.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Podilian Bulletin: Agriculture, Engineering, Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Public Policy and Administration agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this licence are made clear.