PRODUCTIVITY HYBRIDS SUGAR-BEETS DEPENDING OF NUTRITION NORMS IN THE PRIDNESTROVIE TERMS

О. А. Яцева, Д. В. Бучковський

Abstract


Relevance of the topic is to contribute to the stabilization in sugar production in Ukraine by improving the productivity of sugar beet hybrids depends of nutrition norms. We investigated in research normal nutrition norm(the rate of planned productivity of 50 t/ha) and higher nutrition norm(the rate of planned productivity of 60 t/ha); contents of sugar in roots sugar-beets and collecting sugar. Researches were conducted during 2015-2016 years on the experimental field research and production center “Podillja”. Where laid threefactors field researches to study nutrition norms on the rate of planned productivity and plant density of sugar-beets hybrids. On the results of research; we have found that; the weight of root and yield grew on all hybrids on higher nutrition norm comparing with normal nutrition. But; better harvest indicators were on all nutrient norms are Avtoritetnyi; Vavilov and Ronald; than Yashin. With increase yield on higher nutrition norm; sugar indicators decrease a little bit. On control and hybrid Vavilov sugar indicators decrease on 0;3%; Ronald - 0;1% and most decrease was in hybrid Yashin - 0;9%; comparing with normal nutrition norm. Highest indicator of collecting sugar has been on higher nutrition norm at hybrids Vavilov; Ronald and Avtoritetnyi. Results of field and lab research gave the opportunity optimisation fertilization norm of mineral nutritions for studied hybrids; which in turn can provide higher productivity and technological quality indicators roots of sugar-beets.

Keywords


sugar-beet; nutrition norms; yield; sugar content; sugar obtaining

References


Kurganskyi, V.P. (1999). Optimizaciya mineral’nogo pitanija [Optimization mineral nutrients]. Saharnaya svekla, 1, 11-12.

Borysjuk, V.A. (1992). Formuvannya optymal’noji gustoty [Formation of optimum density]. Cukrovi burjaky, 2, 12-14.

Orehovskyj, A.F. (1998). Skol’ko udobrenij nughno svekle? [How much fertilizer should be beet?]. Saharnaya svekla , 4, 13-15.

Rojik, M.V. (2001). Burjaky [Sugar-beets]. Kyiv : XXІ vik

Rojik M.V., Bahmat, M.I., & Ignat’ev, M.O. (2008). Burjakivnyctvo [Sugar-beets]. Kamianets-Podilskyi : Мedobory.

Ermantraut E.R., & Umruhin N.L. (2006). Vplyv foniv ghyvltnnja ta strokiv zbyrannja na productyvnist’ CH S hibrydiv [The impact of nutrition backgrounds and harvesting times on productivity of hybrids]. Cukrovi burjaky, 6, 18-19.


GOST Style Citations


Курганский В.П. Оптимизация минерального питания. Сахарная свекла. 1999. № 1. С. 11-12.

Борисюк В.А. Формування оптимальної густоти. Цукрові буряки. 1992. № 2. С. 12-14.

Ореховский А.Ф. Сколько удобрений нужно свекле? Сахарная свекла. 1998. № 4. С. 13-15.

Роїк М.В. Буряки. Київ : “XXІ вік”, 2001. C. 33-39.

Роїк М.В., Бахмат М.І., Ігнатьєв М.О. Буряківництво. Медобори, 2008. C. 37-46.

Ермантраут Е.Р., Умрихін Н.Л. Вплив фонів живлення та строків збирання на продуктивність ЧС гібридів. Цукрові буряки. 2006. № 6. С. 18-19.




Copyright (c) 2019 Podilian Bulletin: Agriculture, Engineering, Economics

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


Ліцензія Creative CommonsState Agrarian and Egineering University in Podilya